<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://www.californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/rss.sjs" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title>Californians For Democracy - Press Releases</title>
        <link>http://www.californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/rss.sjs</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>eng</language>
            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:44:28 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>CPR covers &quot;the argument that goes beyond semantics&quot;</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">LAKOFF'S INITIATIVE: DON'T T-YOU,  DON'T T-ME, T-THE MAN BEHIND THE TREE</span></b><br />
<b><br />
CA Progress Report | April 5, 2010 | By Peter Schrag | <a href="http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/?q=node/7629"><span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179);">LINK TO ARTICLE</span></a></b><br />
<br />
The chances that Berkeley linguistics expert George Lakoff will get his  California Democracy Act initiative on the November ballot range between  slim and slimmer. But in contending that Attorney General Jerry Brown’s  title and ballot summary would destroy any chance of its passing even  if it qualified, Lakoff starts an argument that goes well beyond  semantics. It tells a lot about why California is stuck in the mess that  it’s in.<br />
<br />
In requiring two-thirds majorities to approve both the annual budget –  and all other spending measures – and to raise taxes, California is the  only state in the union that gives legislative minorities -- usually  meaning Republicans – a veto on both budgeting and taxes. Lakoff, who’s  been a guru on language to a lot of politicians, wants to end what is in  effect minority rule.<br />
<br />
As it came from the author, his measure is summarized by one simple  sentence: “All legislative actions on revenue and budget must be  determined by a majority vote.” Wherever California’s constitution  provides for two thirds majorities in the Assembly and Senate on  appropriations and tax increases, it changes the “two-thirds” to a  majority...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2455</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:27:18 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>AlterNet reports on Lakoff&apos;s solution to fix California</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2454</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">GEORGE LAKOFF'S 14 WORDS THAT COULD  FIX CA</span></b><br />
<b><br />
AlterNet | March 25, 2010 | By Daniela Perdomo | <a href="http://www.alternet.org/economy/146153/george_lakoff%27s_14_words_that_could_fix_california"><span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179);">LINK TO ARTICLE</span></a></b><br />
<br />
<i>The minority rules in the California Legislature, and they're  responsible for the state's budget logjam -- linguist George Lakoff has  an elegant solution to fix it.</i><br />
<br />
Here's the little-known truth about California: Since 1978, the state  has been subject to what is essentially minority rule. Proposition 13 --  mostly packaged as a property tax law change -- was passed that year,  altering the state constitution to read that a two-thirds super-majority  is needed in the state legislature to pass any revenue increases. But  what this has turned out to really mean is that one-third plus one vote,  or 34 percent, of the state legislature can control all legislative  decisions.<br />
<br />
You thought filibustering on Capitol Hill was bad? This is worse. And  California is the only state with such a rule in place, now or ever...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2454</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:34:18 -0400</pubDate>
			<title>SF Bay Guardian reports on CA Democracy Act Poll</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2453</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">POLL: 73% IN FAVOR OF SIMPLE MAJORITY  VOTE FOR BUDGET LEGISLATION</span></b><br />
<b><br />
SF Bay Guardian | March 23, 2010 | By Nima Maghame | <a href="http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2010/03/23/poll-73-percent-favor-simple-majority-vote-budget-legislation"><span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179);">LINK TO ARTICLE</span></a></b><br />
<br />
A new poll by David Binder of DB-Research, conducted on behalf of  Californians For Democracy, shows that 73 percent of California voters  support a simple majority vote for revenue and budget legislation.  Voters were asked to weigh this proposal: “All legislation on revenue  and budget must be determined by a majority vote. Would you vote for  it?” In response, 73 percent said yes, and 22 percent said no.<br />
<br />
The findings are being hailed as a ringing endorsement for the  California Democracy Act, a November 2010 ballot initiative authored by  UC Berkeley Professor George Lakoff that would change the California  Constitution from requiring a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to  approve budget and tax proposals to a simple majority rule. Californians  for Democracy is in the process of gathering signatures for the  initiative...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2453</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:11:01 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>DailyCal reports on The California Democracy Act</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2388</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>AN ACT OF DEMOCRACY FOR THE STATE</b></span><b><br />
<br />
Daily Californian | January 29, 2010 | By David Fielder | <a href="http://www.dailycal.org/article/108002/an_act_of_democracy_for_the_state">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
The California Democracy Act, a non-partisan constitutional amendment authored by UC Berkeley Professor George Lakoff, consists in its entirety of a mere 14 words:<br />
<br />
<b> "All legislative actions on revenue and budget must be determined by a majority vote."</b><br />
<br />
California is one of the only states in the nation to constitutionally give a 34 percent minority of its state representatives direct control over all such legislation-thereby ensuring the budget and revenue gridlock we are experiencing.<br />
<br />
California is in the middle of an unprecedented economic crisis requiring fundamental new approaches for resolution. Creativity is essential as we are currently unable to implement more obvious solutions to resolving the crisis. For example, we are also one of the only significant oil producing states that fails to charge oil companies an extraction tax on the oil they pump-even Governor Sarah Palin prided herself on taxing Alaska's oil profiteers. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2388</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:10:25 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>Lakoff: Where&apos;s The Movement?</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2386</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>WHERE’S THE MOVEMENT?</b></span><b><br />
<br />
Huffington Post | January 25, 2010 | By George Lakoff | <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-lakoff/wheres-the-movement_b_435045.html">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
In forming his administration, President Obama abandoned the movement that had begun during his campaign for deal-making and a pragmatism that hasn't worked. That movement is still possible and needed now. Here is look at what is required, and how a version of it is forming in California.<br />
<br />
We begin with this week's triple whammy.<br />
<br />
<b>Freedom vs. The Public Option</b><br />
<br />
Which would you prefer, consumer choice or freedom? Extended coverage or freedom? Bending the cost curve or freedom?<br />
<br />
John Boehner, House Minority Leader, speaking of health care, said recently, "This bill is the greatest threat to freedom that I have seen in the 19 years I have been here in Washington....It's going to lead to a government takeover of our insurance] for you." ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2386</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:09:45 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>SF Bay Guardian reports on restoring Majority Rule to CA</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2384</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">RESTORING MAJORITY RULE</span><br />
<span style="font-size: larger;">Ballots measures seek to break California's political and financial gridlock</span><br />
<br />
SF Bay Guardian | January 13, 2010 | By Sarah Phelan | <a href="http://www.bayguardian.com/entry.php?entry_id=9661&amp;catid=&amp;volume_id=452&amp;issue_id=468&amp;volume_num=44&amp;issue_num=16">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's lame duck response to California's projected $20 billion state deficit has given supporters of more than 30 budget and revenue-related state initiatives now in circulation a renewed sense of urgency as they scramble to gather signatures and qualify proposed solutions to the state's ongoing financial emergency for the November ballot.<br />
<br />
But while this plethora of initiatives reflects widespread frustration over the state's broken system of governance, disagreement rages over how to fix it and how best to restore majority rule to California.<br />
<br />
"These are the hardest decisions a government must make, yet there is simply no conceivable way to avoid more cuts and more pain," the governor told reporters Jan. 8 as he released a new budget proposal calling for $8.5 billion in cuts to state workers' wages, health and human services, and prisons; a legally questionable $4.5 billion shift in other funds; and $6.9 billion in federal reimbursements that have yet to be approved.<br />
<br />
Even steeper social services cuts are in the works, Schwarzenegger warned, if the feds don't comply with this request for a bailout. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2384</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:08:05 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>UCSD Guardian reports on the UC budget crisis</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2381</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">STEP ONE: TEAR THE RED TAPE</span><br />
<br />
UCSD Guardian | January 4, 2010 | By Cheryl Hori | <a href="http://www.ucsdguardian.org/opinion/step-one-tear-the-red-tape/">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
<i><b>STATE NEWS</b></i> — Mere weeks after the UC Board of Regents approved a 32-percent fee hike, a group of UC students and faculty have stashed away their “Lay off Yudof” picket signs and shifted their sights to higher ground: the California congressional floor.<br />
<br />
Authored by UC Berkeley professor of linguistics George Lakoff, the California Democracy Act would allow legislative decisions regarding government spending to be passed by a simple majority, rather than the current two-thirds super majority. A simple 14-word change to the California constitution might not be a permanent solution to the UC budget crisis, but the bill would be a giant leap forward for our dysfunctional legislative system.<br />
<br />
In 1978, Proposition 13 amended the California Constitution to require a two-thirds majority vote on every finance-related bill. But 32 years later, California finds itself in an economic gridlock. With the deciding vote thrust into the hands of a one-third legislative minority, the budget isn’t often passed on time, and public services have been cut as a result. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2381</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:08:45 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>UCSD Guardian reports on students rallying for Majority Rule</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>STUDENTS RALLY FOR SIMPLE MAJORITY</b></span><b><br />
<br />
UCSD Guardian | January 4, 2010 | By H. Bisceglia-Martin | <a href="http://www.ucsdguardian.org/news/students-rally-for-simple-majority/">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
After a year of protesting outside UC Board of Regents meetings and firing insults at UC President Mark Yudof, student activists have turned their attention — and well-honed flyering skills — toward Sacramento, with a ballot initiative called the California Democracy Act.<br />
<br />
The initiative, drafted by UC Berkeley linguistics professor George Lakoff, would reduce the two-thirds legislative majority required to make any budgetary decision to a simple majority.<br />
<br />
According to Lakoff, if budget and revenue proposals require support from only 50 percent of legislators in the assembly and senate, much of the budget gridlock would be alleviated, and the government would be able to increase statewide revenue more easily.<br />
<br />
Lakoff said he hopes that some of that extra revenue would make its way to the UC system. Chris Ah San, Student Organizing Director of the California Democracy Act Coalition, agreed. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2382</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:19:35 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>New York Times reports on the California Democracy Act</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">LAKOFF TRIES TO REFRAME SACTO’S CONVERSATION</span><br />
<br />
New York Times | January 4, 2010 | By Michelle Quinn | <a href="http://bayarea.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/george-lakoff-wants-to-change-the-conversation/">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
George Lakoff <a href="http://www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/people/person_detail.php?person=21">is known</a> for, among other things, writing books about how the outcome of political debates and campaigns often depends on how the conversation has been framed, who controls the metaphors used. He has spoken to lawmakers in Washington and Sacramento and analyzed conservative spin and why liberals have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/books/review/Saletan-t.html?_r=1">failed</a> in some of their efforts.<br />
<br />
So why is <i>he</i> trying to get more than one million signatures to put an initiative on the California ballot in November 2010? “It’s not fun,” he said. “It’s an education.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Lakoff’s proposed ballot initiative would change California’s constitution to allow a majority of the state legislature to pass a budget or to raise revenue. It has been a source of frustration for some lawmakers that it takes not a simple majority, but two-thirds of the legislature to pass a budget (which has been true since the 1930’s) and to raise taxes (true since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978).<br />
<br />
Mr. Lakoff had heard lawmakers’ frustrations but saw no one else taking action...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2383</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:07:11 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>SF Chronicle reports on the California Democracy Act Coalition</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2380</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">STUDENTS SEEK CLOUT BEYOND CAMPUSES</span><br />
<br />
SF Chronicle | December 20, 2009 | By Tim Holt | <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/12/20/IND51B4RBI.DTL">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
An earlier generation of college students took on the Vietnam War. Now a new generation is poised to take on the mess in Sacramento.<br />
<br />
This Christmas break, students from University of California and state and community college campuses will fan out across the state to collect signatures in support of an initiative that would free the Legislature from its two-thirds vote requirement on budget and revenue matters. Their goal is to collect enough signatures by April 15 to qualify for the November 2010 ballot.<br />
<br />
Amid a welter of sit-ins, teach-ins and building takeovers, this is a bold effort to reach beyond the campuses and address the chronic problems of a dysfunctional Legislature and the state's fiscal crisis. If it passes, the California Democracy Act will allow a simple majority in the Legislature to pass a budget and balance it if necessary with new revenue sources.<br />
<br />
The effort no doubt will be greeted with a great deal of cynicism. But, really, who better than a bunch of raw, politically inexperienced students to tackle the mess in Sacramento? Who else has the sense of urgency, the bulletproof optimism, needed for such an undertaking? ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2380</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:39:09 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>Amy Goodman interviews Lakoff on CA budget crisis</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2378</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>GOODMAN INTERVIEWS LAKOFF ON CA BUDGET CRISIS</b></span><b><br />
<br />
Democracy Now | November 18, 2009 | <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/18/amidst_california_fiscal_crisis_and_political">LINK TO WATCH &amp; TRANSCRIPT</a></b><br />
<br />
<i>Amidst California Fiscal Crisis and Political Gridlock, Scholar and Activist George Lakoff Proposes Ballot Measure to End 2/3 Rule in State Legislature<br />
<br />
California struggles with a crippling $21 billion project deficit, professor and progressive activist George Lakoff has submitted a 2010 ballot proposition that would roll back the two-thirds majority needed to pass a budget and, he says, end the gridlock created by minority rule. [rush transcript below &amp; to watch / listen <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/18/amidst_california_fiscal_crisis_and_political">click here</a>]</i><br />
<b><br />
AMY GOODMAN:</b> We turn now to the budget crisis here in California. The state faces a projected deficit of $21 billion, according to a new report from the state’s budget analyst. The prospect for further cuts loom.<br />
<br />
I’m joined now from Berkeley, California by a man who says the real cause of the state’s fiscal problems is its “dysfunctional system of government." ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2378</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:29:51 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>UC Berkeley News reports on reframing the state budget debate</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>HOW TO SOLVE CALIFORNIA’S FISCAL CRISIS?<br />
First, don’t think of an elephant</b></span><b><br />
<br />
UC Berkeley News | November 12, 2009 | By Barry Bergman | <a href="http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/11/12_lakoff.shtml">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
<i>Berkeley linguist George Lakoff aims to break legislative gridlock by reframing the budget debate statewide, and restoring majority rule in Sacramento</i><br />
<br />
<b>BERKELEY</b> — If they noticed it at all, readers of the <i>Contra Costa Times</i> must have found the brief announcement utterly commonplace. "Linguistics expert and UC Berkeley professor George Lakoff will speak at the Nov. 12 meeting of the Lamorinda Democratic Club," it began, just another routine listing in the paper's "Political Notes" column. Few would have blinked at its characterization of the evening's topic: Lakoff's ballot proposal to "eliminate the two-thirds voting requirement for a state budget or new taxes."<br />
<br />
Yet the item's very innocuousness — with its seemingly neutral reference to taxes — hints at the size of the challenge Lakoff faces in his fledgling quest to end gridlock in Sacramento. For Lakoff, a cognitive scientist best-known for his work on "framing" and for dissecting the political mind in such books as <i>Moral Politics</i> and <i>Don't Think of an Elephant</i>, language is anything but neutral. And for his initiative to have a shot at becoming law, it's crucial that voters don't think of it as a license to boost their taxes.<br />
<br />
"This isn't about taxes," he insists, slapping the desk in his small Dwinelle Hall office for emphasis. "It's about democracy." ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2377</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:16:53 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>Angie Coiro interviews Garamendi &amp; Lakoff about Majority Rule</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2376</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>ENDING MINORITY RULE</b></span><b><br />
<br />
Live From The Left Coast with Angie Coiro | September 28, 2009 | <a href="http://lftlc.com/node/192/180">LINK TO LISTEN</a></b><br />
<br />
Professor and framing expert George Lakoff, <a href="http://www.garamendi.org/">Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi</a> and strategist David Atkins (<a href="http://thereisnospoon.dailykos.com/">There Is No Spoon</a> on Daily Kos) discuss Lakoff's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-lakoff/ending-minority-rule-in-c_b_298493.html">ballot proposition</a> to end the requirement of a two-thirds supermajority for budget passage in California.</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2376</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:37:27 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>Calitics reports on Lakoff&apos;s Majority Rule forum at SEIU 721</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2375</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>LAKOFF’S REMARKS ON THE MAJORITY RULE INITIATIVE</b></span><b><br />
<br />
Calitics | September 25, 2009 | By Dante Atkins | <a href="http://www.calitics.com/diary/10151/lakoffs-remarks-on-the-majority-rule-initiative">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
What follows below the fold are George Lakoff's remarks on the majority rule initiative from the forum this evening.<br />
<br />
Notes on Lakoff forum<br />
<br />
ERIC BAUMAN:<br />
53% of revenue now based on personal income tax.  Used to be 23% when Prop 13 passed.<br />
<br />
Vehicle license fee: $6.3 billion in today's dollars. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2375</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:03:50 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>Lakoff: Ending Minority Rule in California</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2373</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">ENDING MINORITY RULE IN CA: ONE SENTENCE CAN DO IT</span></span><b><br />
<br />
Huffington Post | September 24, 2009 | By George Lakoff | <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-lakoff/ending-minority-rule-in-c_b_298493.html"><span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179);">LINK TO ARTICLE</span></a></b><br />
<br />
California is in deep trouble because it has a dysfunctional system of government. Much of the problem can be changed by one sentence.<br />
<br />
I have sent to the Attorney General a ballot proposition for the 2010 ballot called The California Democracy Act, whose content is the following:<br />
<br />
<b>All legislative action on revenue and budget must be determined by a majority vote.</b><br />
<br />
It would change two words in the Constitution, turning "two-thirds" to "majority" in two places. It is simple, understandable, and it is about democracy. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2373</guid>
		</item>

            
		<item>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:52:06 -0500</pubDate>
			<title>Calitics reports on CA Democracy Act papers filed</title>
			<link>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2374</link>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>GEORGE LAKOFF SUBMITS MAJORITY VOTE INITIATIVE</b></span><b><br />
<br />
Calitics | September 25, 2009 | By Robert Cruickshank | <a href="http://www.calitics.com/diary/10149/george-lakoff-submits-majority-vote-initiative">LINK TO ARTICLE</a></b><br />
<br />
With tomorrow being the recommended deadline for submitting initiatives for the November 2010 ballot, we're starting to see people file their proposals. One of those is George Lakoff's initiative to restore majority rule on both the budget and revenues. His initiative is quite simple, reading in essence:<br />
<br />
<i>“All legislative actions on revenue and budget must be determined by a majority vote”</i><br />
<br />
Of course, this initiative doesn't address the requirement for voters to approve taxes by a 2/3rds rule, nor does it seem to deal with the Prop 218 requirements for local governments to submit tax increases to those voters. But this would almost totally eliminate the conservative veto in Sacramento.<br />
<br />
It's unclear whether there will be the resources to get this on the ballot. But you can learn more about this in LA tonight at 7PM at a meeting Lakoff and grassroots activists are holding at the SEIU 721 offices at 500 S. Virgil just west of downtown LA.<br />
<br />
We still expect to see other initiatives dealing with the 2/3rds rule to be filed in the coming days. ...</p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://californiansfordemocracy.com/p/salsa/web/news/public/?news_item_KEY=2374</guid>
		</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
